Monday, January 18, 2016

Topic one

       The process that goes into putting food on the table in America has changed dramatically in the last 50 years. In the past, most farms were small and labor intensive. They required a relatively large group of highly skilled workers to raise animals and produce food. Antibiotics did not have widespread use. Technology and standardization were less prevalent. Farms were somewhat unique. Present day farms are large and built for mass production. The process is streamlined. Workers are fewer and less skilled. Everything is standardized for maximum efficiency. Animals are fed a specific amount of food to get the greatest return on investment. There is also a widespread use of antibiotics. This leads to the growth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria which leads to a host of other problems, including human and animal disease that can't be treated by drugs.
    Another problem present day farms have is waste treatment. Before, animals weren't confined and their feces was spread out throughout the land they grazed on. Now, with the animals packed together in huge groups, feces is produced at a fast rate in a confined area. Farms are typically in rural areas, away from waste-treatment plants. So this huge amount of waste isn't disposed of properly and can threaten the neighboring human population with disease and water contamination.
  This problem is fixable, but would be detrimental to the IFAP system. Farming could be taken back to the old ways where animals aren't as densely confined. This way manure would be less dense and the problems associated with it would be less severe. The system of farming could be promoted by government subsidies for SMALL farms only.   

http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/nspills.asp


   

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

EROI HW

EROI

1.) We should extract oil from tar sands first because they have a higher EROEI than oil shale.
2.) One similarity between the process used to get oil from shale and the process used to extract oil from tar sands is the use of heat. Heat causes the kerogen in oil shale to form crude oil and natural gas while it used in the tar sands to extract bitumen, which is further refned.
3.) A key difference between the process that is used to get oil from shale and the process used to get oil from tar sands is, the bitumen extracted from the tar sands needs to be upgraded with either methane or hydrogen from more natural gas in order to be refined further. With the process used to get oil from shale, adding another substance is not needed for refining the crude oil and natural gas derived from it.
4.) The author believes that offshore drilling will decrease greenhouse gas emissions in the future because he believes that restricting drilling will make oil more expensive, making it more economically viable to exploit low EROEI fuel sources. This will cause more greenhouse gases to be produced to extract these low EROEI fuels in addition to the greenhouse gases produced when these low EROEI fuels are used. The author also believes that restricting drilling will increase our demand for foreign fuels who may not be carbon efficient as us. The author believes these effects of restricting offshore drilling would produce more greenhouse gases than offshore drilling itself.
5.) I eat food to gain energy. I gain more calories (energy) than the calories (energy) used to eat the food and exploit the energy from it. If there was less calories in the food I ate than the amount of calories I needed to eat and digest that food, I would die.

Sunday, November 1, 2015

Research Plan for Seneca Lake


Research Question: How will the levels of dissolved oxygen and PH affect the amount of macro-invertebrate in the water.

Independent Variable: The depth of the water and sample locations.

Dependent Variable: The levels of dissolved oxygen and PH.

      As mentioned in the packet, Seneca Lake is a water source for over 100,000 people (page 18). It is vital to monitor this water to avoid letting the water quality to succumb to unhealthy levels and possibly having adverse effects on the drinking population. Scientists study macroinvertebrates to detect a body of water's dissolved oxygen and PH levels to determine whether it is fit for human consumption and is able to support life in the water. So we will measure the population of macroinvertebrates to insure the water is fit for human consumption . If there are very little to no macroinvertebrates that means the water is not safe for human consumption and people will have to go elsewhere for water.

Methods: Keep everything exactly the same throughout and follow exact procedures in each sample location.

Hypothesis: I believe that medium levels of PH and dissolved oxygen will result in a healthy amount of macroinvertebrates.

Procedure: 1.) Go to sample location. Measure depth.
                  2.) Measure PH levels using the instructions on the guide to Seneca Lake. (page 20)
                  3.) Measure dissolved oxygen levels using instructions on guide to Seneca Lake.
                       (page 20)
                  4.) Measure macroinvertebrate population using instructions on guide to Seneca Lake
                       (page 27 and 28)
                  5.) Repeat at other sample locations.

Question: What weather is predicted for the trip on Thursday?


"How Biologists Study Streams." N.p., n.d. Web. <http://chamisa.freeshell.org/science.htm>.

"Biological Monitoring." U.S Government, n.d. Web. <http://www.dep.wv.gov/wwe/watershed/bio_fish/pages/bio_fish.aspx>.

Science on Seneca. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.




Thursday, October 1, 2015

Biomagnification Case Study

  Biomagnification of micro beads in fish is an increasing problem in the Great Lakes and Wisconsin. The beads are found in soaps and toothpaste. They find their way down the drain and aren't filtered out by the water treatment facilities because of its small size. It then finds its way into lakes, rivers, streams where it is mistaken for food by small fish and eaten. Then many of these little fish with these beads are eaten by larger fish. So the amount of plastic that larger fish has increases with every contaminated little fish it eats. Then an even larger fish eats that and the process is repeated until the food chain reaches the top predator who has a very a high level of micro bead contaminants. There are no clean up efforts being considered but Governor Scott Walker is eliminating them from Wisconsin completely. He signed legislature that phases out their manufacturing by 2018 and their sale by 2019.

"Wisconsin to Phase out Microplastics to Protect Great Lakes." Wisconsin to Phase out Microplastics to Protect Great Lakes. Wisconsin Gazette, n.d. Web. 02 Oct. 2015. <http://www.wisconsingazette.com/wisconsin/wisconsin-to-phase-out-microplastics-to-protect-great-lakes.html>.